posted Oct 5, 2010 12:39 AM by Tyler Durden
The EMSA
responds to the EDSA ASA
dispute presentation with a 4 Oct letter to its members ASA
Dispute - A response to EDSA's Misleading comments.
From page 5:
"The ASA Board was not aware of
Mr. Billings’ notice at the
time that it directed the issuance if its notice of a special general
meeting."
I would
respectfully ask the author of this document to look at the timestamp
and distribution list of this email
submitted to the courts as part of Mr Innes's affidavit.
And from page 9
"The EMSA Board believes that
the EDSA Board’s involvement in this dispute is primarily
focused upon taking away EMSA’s voice, and in turn the voice
of all children and other soccer participants in EMSA’s
programs, in soccer matters at the provincial level. The EDSA Board
wishes to reclaim its prior influence and effectively reverse the
impact of the 2006 Arbitration Award. To do so the EDSA Board is
prepared to skew and misrepresent the facts to its members and to the
public. The misleading and incomplete information presented by the EDSA
Board to its members at the EDSA Meeting and the lawsuit commenced by
EDSA against the ASA Board are examples of the extent that the EDSA
Board is willing to take to reclaim its influence. We expect that the
EDSA Board will continue to mislead and misrepresent this situation
without regard to the consequences that this has upon soccer
participants and the game of soccer in general (including the legal
costs that all parties are incurring). Ultimately, EDSA only has one
goal – to control the votes that EMSA is currently entitled
to and to represent District 8 itself (in cooperation with EIYSA) at
the Provincial level."
|
|
|